Stellar Population Modelling
Predicting and describing galaxy evolution
The dark Universe is filled with shining galaxies. Galaxies shine in virtue of their stellar content and the emitted radiation reaches us from the most remote regions of the Universe. Stellar radiation can be modelled following robust physical principles, the light emitted by galaxies can be used as a probe of structure formation and evolution in the Universe and as a cosmic chronometer.
A galaxy contains million to billion stars. The total energetics emission of a galaxy is the sum of the light from all stars, which in turn depend at first on stellarĀ energetics, lifetimes and the stellar initial mass function. It also depends on parameters that are specific of the different galaxies, such as history of star formation, chemical composition and dust content.
ICG researchers Claudia Maraston and Daniel Thomas are world leaders in the field. Their seminal results are:
1. the inclusion of the Thermally-Pulsating Asymptotic Giant Branch stage of stellar evolution [1], that impacts on the interpretation of galaxies especially at high-redshift galaxies [2];
2. the account of non-solar element ratios in the model spectral lines [3,4], which has allowed to understand the formation timescales of elliptical galaxies [5].
Recent results include he calculation and analysis of models at high spectral resolution [6]. The figure shows how well the models fit real stellar populations. These models meet the advancements in new instrumentations and galaxy surveys, such as MaNGA.
Stellar population models are also a key ingredient of Galaxy Formation and Evolution models. A team led by ICG researcher Claudia Maraston was the first to explore the effect of stellar population models on the properties of galaxy models in a Cold Dark Matter Universe [7,8].
The models are available at: www.maraston.eu and http://www.icg.port.ac.uk/~thomasd/.
References
1. Maraston 2005;
2. Maraston et al. 2006;
3. Thomas, Maraston, Bender 2003 ;
4. Thomas, Maraston, Johansson 2011;
5. Thomas et al. 2005;
6. Maraston & Stromback 2011;
7. Tonini, Maraston et al. 2010;
8. Henriques, Maraston et al. 2011.